The move was welcomed by Israel, which said it was a “first and necessary step towards the goal of restoring Iran’s compliance with its safeguards obligations”.
After the adoption of the resolution, the US, Britain, France and Germany urged Iran “to fulfil its legal obligations, and cooperate with the IAEA”.
The foreign ministries of the four Western nations issued a joint statement welcoming the IAEA’s resolution “responding to Iran’s insufficient cooperation with the IAEA on serious and outstanding safeguards issues”, surrounding its nuclear activities.
“The overwhelming majority vote at the IAEA Board of Governors today sends an unambiguous message to Iran that it must meet its safeguards obligations and provide technically credible clarifications on outstanding safeguards issues,” the statement added.
“We urge Iran to heed the call of the international community to fulfil its legal obligations, and cooperate with the IAEA to fully clarify and resolve issues without further delay.”
‘Goodwill gesture’ ends
Iran earlier said the cameras it had disconnected had been operating as a “goodwill gesture”, outside its safeguard agreement with the IAEA.
“As of today, the relevant authorities have been instructed to cut off the On-Line Enrichment Monitor and the flow meter cameras of the agency,” said the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran.
The AEOI added that Iran’s agreement to allow the cameras to run was not “appreciated” by the UN agency but considered an “obligation”.
Its statement did not specify how many cameras had been turned off, but said “more than 80 per cent of the agency’s existing cameras are operating according to the safeguard agreement and will continue to operate just as before”.
Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman for the Iranian agency, had “monitored the shutdown of two IAEA cameras at a nuclear facility,” the statement added.
“Other measures are being considered and we hope that they will come to their senses and respond to Iran’s cooperation with cooperation,” he told state TV.
The US State Department said that Iran’s reported move, if confirmed, was “extremely regrettable” and “counterproductive” to attempts to revive the 2015 nuclear deal.
Iran reached the deal limiting its nuclear programme in return for sanctions relief—but the agreement has been on life support since then president Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew the United States from it in 2018.
Tehran, which denies seeking to build a nuclear bomb, has backed away from some of its own commitments since 2019.
European capitals have expressed mounting concern over how far Iran has gone in resuming nuclear activities since the US began reimposing sanctions in 2018.
Iran has built up large stockpiles of enriched uranium, some of it enriched to levels far higher than those needed for nuclear power generation.
‘No hidden activities’
Iran’s nuclear organisation chief Mohammad Eslami had said earlier Wednesday that “Iran has no hidden or undocumented nuclear activities or undisclosed sites,” state news agency IRNA reported.
“These fake documents seek to maintain maximum pressure” on Iran, he added, referring respectively to the three sites that the IAEA is concerned about and the crippling economic sanctions reimposed by Washington under Trump.
“This recent move by three European countries and the US by presenting a draft resolution against Iran is a political one,” Eslami said, adding Iran had maintained “maximum cooperation” with the IAEA.
The UN watchdog has said its questions about the three sites were “not clarified” in its meetings with Iranian authorities.
The talks to revive the 2015 nuclear accord started in April 2021 with the aim of bringing the United States back in, lifting sanctions and getting Iran to return to the limits it agreed to on its nuclear activities.
But negotiations have stalled in recent months and the European Union’s top diplomat Josep Borrell warned last weekend that the possibility of returning to the accord was “shrinking”.
IAEA head Rafael Grossi said Monday that it would be “a matter of just a few weeks” before Iran could get sufficient material needed for a nuclear weapon if it continues to develop its programme.