Katiadi Model Police Station inspector (Investigation) Shafiqul Islam claimed that he had learned that farmer Abu Zaman was framed in the case due to a land dispute. If Abu Zaman is found innocent in the investigation, he will be released from the case. This argument of the investigating officer is not acceptable. Those who do not have the opportunity to use digital media cannot be sued under this law. Abu Zaman does not have Facebook or smartphone. There is no scope to file a case against him under the Digital Security Act.
Police cannot take up a case against anyone illegally. Rather, if anyone comes to file such a case, their responsibility is to take legal action against the person concerned. A case has been filed against Abu Zaman under sections 25, 29 and 31 of the DSA respectively. His wife alleged that the case was filed with the intention of harrassing their family.
In the last two days, a 10th class student and a 17-year-old college student of Class 12 have been arrested in Thakurgaon under the Digital Security Act, the Daily Star reported. The latter boy aired a video protesting the visit of a neighbouring country’s prime minister to Bangladesh. Police acknowledged that he had deleted the video from his mobile phone before being arrested.
And in this case, the jurisdiction to file a case has also been questioned. Lawyers believe a third party cannot file a case under DSA. The victim who thinks he has been maligned by any action should file a lawsuit. Abusing digital security laws and harassing innocent people should be stopped.
Those under the age of 18 are identified as children or adolescents. Police said that such videos or propaganda can create resentment in the minds of the people. If a crime has indeed been committed by the two students, there may be a trial under another law, obviously not under the Digital Security Act.